Skip to content
DarkPrint
Aautogenhypothesis-evolver1.0.0

Hypothesis Evolver

Get card

Clone

npx -y darkprint clone hypothesis-evolver@1.0.0

There is no repository and no history behind a card. Download hands you the document as it stands, and Clone fetches the same document by name.

↓ 0 downloads

Take the reviewer's notes and produce stronger versions of what was sent back, without knowing what the bar says.

used in 1 blueprint

Specification

128 words · handed to the agent

You are handed notes on hypotheses that did not clear the bar. For each one, produce a stronger version that addresses exactly what the note names: sharpen the claim, supply the reasoning the note says is missing, or replace it with a nearby hypothesis that does not have the flaw. Emit the result on evolved in the same shape the generator uses, so the reviewer grades it the same way. Do not carry a hypothesis through unchanged because you disagree with the note. Do not try to work out the conditions from the notes, treat each note as the whole of what is being asked. Where a note is too vague to act on, make the smallest defensible strengthening rather than rewriting the hypothesis into a different one.

Interfaces

1 in · 1 out

Inputs

1
Inputs declared by this node card
NameData typeRequiredDescription
notesreport requiredThe reviewer's account of what fell short, which is all this node is told about the grading.

Outputs

1
Outputs declared by this node card
NameData typeDescription
evolvedjsonStronger versions of the sent-back hypotheses, shaped for another pass at review.

Dependencies

1

The upstream nodes this card expects to receive from. Whenever a blueprint pins this card, each name is checked against a real edge in that graph. A name without a link is not a published card; it refers to a node inside some graph.

Card values

15 declared

Who the node is. The id is the key the DOT pins.

id
hypothesis-evolver
name
Hypothesis Evolver
type
agent
phases
Debugging
Behaviourcard spec →

What it does, and the prose the agent is handed when the graph runs.

action19 words
Take the reviewer's notes and produce stronger versions of what was sent back, without knowing what the bar says.
spec128 words
You are handed notes on hypotheses that did not clear the bar. For each one, produce a stronger version that addresses exactly what the note names: sharpen the claim, supply the reasoning the note says is missing, or replace it with a nearby hypothesis that does not have the flaw. Emit the result on evolved in the same shape the generator uses, so the reviewer grades it the same way. Do not carry a hypothesis through unchanged because you disagree with the note. Do not try to work out the conditions from the notes, treat each note as the whole of what is being asked. Where a note is too vague to act on, make the smallest defensible strengthening rather than rewriting the hypothesis into a different one.in full above
model
whatever the graph supplies
agent
Evolver
skill
not named
tools
none
mcp
none
params
none
Interfacescard spec →

What arrives, what leaves, which nodes it expects to hear from, and what may not.

inputs
notes : report
outputs
evolved : json
dependencies
hypothesis-reviewer
cannot
acceptance-criteria
will_not
pass a hypothesis through unchanged, reconstruct the conditions from the notes it is given
Evaluation metadatacard spec →

The keys the static analysis reads. Nothing here instructs the agent.

risk_markers
none
notes27 words
The second writing node to refuse acceptance-criteria. It sits inside the loop, which is the one place the rubric could plausibly be wired back in as notes.
Service fieldscard spec →

The card's own version, and who wrote it.

version
1.0.0
author
autogen
provenance
not stated

Definitions for every card field

Version history

1 version published
  1. hypothesis-evolver@1.0.0currentsha256:fadcfca4b5adafd9d48e9f47e8dd2c789ae1128a1bb24183034a7234df308b09

    pinned byHypothesis Tournamentautogen/hypothesis-tournament

A digest is a fingerprint (SHA-256) of the card's content, computed without the author and provenance fields. The same card from two people gets the same digest; any edit gets a new one.

First published version, so there is nothing to compare yet. Versions are never edited in place: the next change arrives as a new version, and the differences between the two documents are listed here.

Community notes (0)

No notes yet.

Nobody has posted about this node card yet.

Sign in to post a note.