Skip to content
DarkPrint
Aautogenreply-qa-check1.0.0

Reply QA Check

Get card

Clone

npx -y darkprint clone reply-qa-check@1.0.0

There is no repository and no history behind a card. Download hands you the document as it stands, and Clone fetches the same document by name.

↓ 1 downloads

Grade the drafted reply against the tone, accuracy and completeness rubric, release it only above the confidence threshold, and emit the score the escalation path branches on.

used in 1 blueprint

Specification

146 words · handed to the agent

Read the drafted reply and the citations attached to it on draft, and grade it against the support-reply-rubric@2 rubric on three axes: tone, factual accuracy and completeness. Check every factual claim in the reply against the citation the draft says supports it, and score an uncited or mis-cited claim as an accuracy failure rather than as a style note. Emit the graded score on confidence as a single number between 0 and 1, and put the reply on approved, unchanged apart from your QA stamp, only when that score is 0.72 or above. The customer's personal details ride inside the draft: leave them there, and do not copy names, addresses, order numbers or account identifiers into the score or into any comment you attach to it. You are done when a score is on confidence and approved carries either the stamped reply or nothing at all.

Interfaces

1 in · 2 out

Inputs

1
Inputs declared by this node card
NameData typeRequiredDescription
draftjson requiredThe composed reply and the citations it claims to rest on.

Outputs

2
Outputs declared by this node card
NameData typeDescription
approvedjsonThe reply cleared for sending, unchanged apart from the QA stamp.
confidencestatusThe graded score, what the escalation branch reads.

Dependencies

1

The upstream nodes this card expects to receive from. Whenever a blueprint pins this card, each name is checked against a real edge in that graph. A name without a link is not a published card; it refers to a node inside some graph.

Card values

18 declared

Who the node is. The id is the key the DOT pins.

id
reply-qa-check
name
Reply QA Check
type
validation
phases
Testing
Behaviourcard spec →

What it does, and the prose the agent is handed when the graph runs.

action27 words
Grade the drafted reply against the tone, accuracy and completeness rubric, release it only above the confidence threshold, and emit the score the escalation path branches on.
spec146 words
Read the drafted reply and the citations attached to it on draft, and grade it against the support-reply-rubric@2 rubric on three axes: tone, factual accuracy and completeness. Check every factual claim in the reply against the citation the draft says supports it, and score an uncited or mis-cited claim as an accuracy failure rather than as a style note. Emit the graded score on confidence as a single number between 0 and 1, and put the reply on approved, unchanged apart from your QA stamp, only when that score is 0.72 or above. The customer's personal details ride inside the draft: leave them there, and do not copy names, addresses, order numbers or account identifiers into the score or into any comment you attach to it. You are done when a score is on confidence and approved carries either the stamped reply or nothing at all.in full above
model
claude-sonnet-5
agent
QA checker
skill
skills/reply-qa-check.md
tools
none
mcp
none
params
rubric_ref: support-reply-rubric@2, confidence_threshold: 0.72
Interfacescard spec →

What arrives, what leaves, which nodes it expects to hear from, and what may not.

inputs
draft : json
outputs
approved : json, confidence : status
dependencies
resolution-composer
cannot
no type is refused
will_not
copy a customer identifier into the score it emits
Evaluation metadatacard spec →

The keys the static analysis reads. Nothing here instructs the agent.

risk_markers
lupo/pii-handling
notes54 words
The customer's details ride through this node inside the draft, which is what the lupo/pii-handling marker records, a local term, because doc 3 §4 has no marker for personal data. The threshold is the one dial that trades escalation volume against send quality; raising it moves work to people rather than improving the replies.
Service fieldscard spec →

The card's own version, and who wrote it.

version
1.0.0
author
autogen
provenance
not stated

Definitions for every card field

Version history

1 version published
  1. reply-qa-check@1.0.0currentsha256:72af41e2cbfd773043fd473e3e4d8f4038193a56e113771486ff7b369c346e8f

    pinned byFrontline Triageautogen/frontline-triage

A digest is a fingerprint (SHA-256) of the card's content, computed without the author and provenance fields. The same card from two people gets the same digest; any edit gets a new one.

First published version, so there is nothing to compare yet. Versions are never edited in place: the next change arrives as a new version, and the differences between the two documents are listed here.

Community notes (0)

No notes yet.

Nobody has posted about this node card yet.

Sign in to post a note.